Guild Basic Needs IndexTM

Guild Basic Needs IndexTM

June 2013
Today’s CPI Doesn’t Resemble Your Grandfather’s CPI
It is important, when viewing the U.S. Government’s Consumer Price Index (CPI), to understand that the CPI tracks consumer spending and not the cost of living.  According to an article in Barron’s this past weekend, the current CPI basket includes prices of 71,000 goods and services — and doesn’t resemble the consumer basket of goods and services from prior decades.  Both the calculations and the selection of data itself have undergone many changes, and in our opinion many of these changes have been done to report a more modest rate of inflation.
The CPI is based on data collected from spending surveys given by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics to approximately 14,000 urban families.  Among the 71,000 items the CPI includes other expenditures, such as recreation, insurance, taxes, personal care services, entertainment purchases, and consumer electronics.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics also periodically alters the contents of the basket, making adjustments to the weighting of the components, and smoothing seasonal patterns.  Such tinkering with data, as we have mentioned over the years, usually results in an understatement of the inflation rate and creates an unreliable, misleading cost-of-living index.
Guild Investment Management has long believed that the existing indices used to measure cost of living changes in the United States are inadequate.
The Guild Basic Needs IndexTM (GBNI) concentrates on four categories of primary and essential living needs: food, clothing, shelter, and energy (which is needed for heating, cooking, and transportation).  The categories and their values within the GBNI are fixed.  There is no seasonal adjusting, smoothing, or replacing of components.
This past weekend’s Barron’s discusses CPI adjustments over the decades and suggests that tracking inflation over a long period of time with a basket that frequently changes is like comparing apples to oranges.  The point they make is that CPI data going back to the 1940s doesn’t relate to today’s CPI data, as people are consuming completely different goods and services.
Our GBNI on the other hand will not change as it represents items that people have been consuming for many generations.  The Barron’s article also suggests that there is logic behind adding items to the CPI as they become significant parts of the consumers’ purchases.  For example automobiles were added in 1935, air conditioners in 1964, and cell phones in 1998.  While these items may be significant purchases, they don’t represent the basic essential needs which we are tracking in our GBNI.  Adding new items to an index that tracks consumer spending makes sense, but we maintain that some of the other manipulations to the CPI calculation over the years are harder to explain.
The modifications to the CPI introduced in the late 1990s, according to the article, suggest that inflation might be understated by 1.3 percentage points per year.  Therefore the calculation of 1.8 percent inflation over the past year could actually be closer to 3.1 percent — and going by our chart below — the CPI calculation of 2.5 percent since January 1, 2000 would actually be 3.8 percent.
Today’s CPI Doesn’t Resemble Your Grandfather’s CPI
It is important, when viewing the U.S. Government’s Consumer Price Index (CPI), to understand that the CPI tracks consumer spending and not the cost of living.  According to an article in Barron’s this past weekend, the current CPI basket includes prices of 71,000 goods and services — and doesn’t resemble the consumer basket of goods and services from prior decades.  Both the calculations and the selection of data itself have undergone many changes, and in our opinion many of these changes have been done to report a more modest rate of inflation.
The CPI is based on data collected from spending surveys given by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics to approximately 14,000 urban families.  Among the 71,000 items the CPI includes other expenditures, such as recreation, insurance, taxes, personal care services, entertainment purchases, and consumer electronics.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics also periodically alters the contents of the basket, making adjustments to the weighting of the components, and smoothing seasonal patterns.  Such tinkering with data, as we have mentioned over the years, usually results in an understatement of the inflation rate and creates an unreliable, misleading cost-of-living index.
Guild Investment Management has long believed that the existing indices used to measure cost of living changes in the United States are inadequate.
The Guild Basic Needs IndexTM (GBNI) concentrates on four categories of primary and essential living needs: food, clothing, shelter, and energy (which is needed for heating, cooking, and transportation).  The categories and their values within the GBNI are fixed.  There is no seasonal adjusting, smoothing, or replacing of components.
This past weekend’s Barron’s discusses CPI adjustments over the decades and suggests that tracking inflation over a long period of time with a basket that frequently changes is like comparing apples to oranges.  The point they make is that CPI data going back to the 1940s doesn’t relate to today’s CPI data, as people are consuming completely different goods and services.
Our GBNI on the other hand will not change as it represents items that people have been consuming for many generations.  The Barron’s article also suggests that there is logic behind adding items to the CPI as they become significant parts of the consumers’ purchases.  For example automobiles were added in 1935, air conditioners in 1964, and cell phones in 1998.  While these items may be significant purchases, they don’t represent the basic essential needs which we are tracking in our GBNI.  Adding new items to an index that tracks consumer spending makes sense, but we maintain that some of the other manipulations to the CPI calculation over the years are harder to explain.
The modifications to the CPI introduced in the late 1990s, according to the article, suggest that inflation might be understated by 1.3 percentage points per year.  Therefore the calculation of 1.8 percent inflation over the past year could actually be closer to 3.1 percent — and going by our chart below — the CPI calculation of 2.5 percent since January 1, 2000 would actually be 3.8 percent.
Today’s CPI Doesn’t Resemble Your Grandfather’s CPI
It is important, when viewing the U.S. Government’s Consumer Price Index (CPI), to understand that the CPI tracks consumer spending and not the cost of living.  According to an article in Barron’s this past weekend, the current CPI basket includes prices of 71,000 goods and services — and doesn’t resemble the consumer basket of goods and services from prior decades.  Both the calculations and the selection of data itself have undergone many changes, and in our opinion many of these changes have been done to report a more modest rate of inflation.
The CPI is based on data collected from spending surveys given by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics to approximately 14,000 urban families.  Among the 71,000 items the CPI includes other expenditures, such as recreation, insurance, taxes, personal care services, entertainment purchases, and consumer electronics.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics also periodically alters the contents of the basket, making adjustments to the weighting of the components, and smoothing seasonal patterns.  Such tinkering with data, as we have mentioned over the years, usually results in an understatement of the inflation rate and creates an unreliable, misleading cost-of-living index.
Guild Investment Management has long believed that the existing indices used to measure cost of living changes in the United States are inadequate.
The Guild Basic Needs IndexTM (GBNI) concentrates on four categories of primary and essential living needs: food, clothing, shelter, and energy (which is needed for heating, cooking, and transportation).  The categories and their values within the GBNI are fixed.  There is no seasonal adjusting, smoothing, or replacing of components.
This past weekend’s Barron’s discusses CPI adjustments over the decades and suggests that tracking inflation over a long period of time with a basket that frequently changes is like comparing apples to oranges.  The point they make is that CPI data going back to the 1940s doesn’t relate to today’s CPI data, as people are consuming completely different goods and services.
Our GBNI on the other hand will not change as it represents items that people have been consuming for many generations.  The Barron’s article also suggests that there is logic behind adding items to the CPI as they become significant parts of the consumers’ purchases.  For example automobiles were added in 1935, air conditioners in 1964, and cell phones in 1998.  While these items may be significant purchases, they don’t represent the basic essential needs which we are tracking in our GBNI.  Adding new items to an index that tracks consumer spending makes sense, but we maintain that some of the other manipulations to the CPI calculation over the years are harder to explain.
The modifications to the CPI introduced in the late 1990s, according to the article, suggest that inflation might be understated by 1.3 percentage points per year.  Therefore the calculation of 1.8 percent inflation over the past year could actually be closer to 3.1 percent — and going by our chart below — the CPI calculation of 2.5 percent since January 1, 2000 would actually be 3.8 percent.

July 25, 2013
  

Today's CPI Doesn't Resemble Your Grandfather's CPI

It is important, when viewing the U.S. Government's Consumer Price Index (CPI), to understand that the CPI tracks consumer spending and not the cost of living. According to an article in Barron's this past weekend, the current CPI basket includes prices of 71,000 goods and services -- and doesn't resemble the consumer basket of goods and services from prior decades.  Both the calculations and the selection of data itself have undergone many changes, and in our opinion many of these changes have been done to report a more modest rate of inflation.

The CPI is based on data collected from spending surveys given by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics to approximately 14, 000 urban families.  Among the 71,000 items the CPI includes other expenditures, such as recreation, insurance, taxes, personal care services, entertainment purchases, and consumer electronics.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics also periodically alters the contents of the basket, making adjustments to the weighting of the components, and smoothing seasonal patterns.  Such tinkering with data, as we have mentioned over the years, usually results in an understatement of the inflation rate and creates an unreliable, misleading cost-of-living index.

Guild Investment Management has long believed that the existing indices used to measure cost of living changes in the United States are inadequate.

The Guild Basic Needs Index TM (GBNI) concentrates on four categories of primary and essential living needs: food, clothing, shelter, and energy (which is needed for heating, cooking, and transportation).  The categories and their values withing the GBNI are fixed.  There is no seasonal adjusting, smoothing, or replacing of components.

This past weekend's Barron's discusses CPI adjustments over the decades and suggests that tracking inflation over a long period of time with a basket that frequently changes is like comparing apples to oranges.  The point they make is that CPI data going back to the 1940s doesn't relate to today's CPI data, as people are consuming completely different goods and services.

Our GBNI on the other hand will not change as it represents items that people have been consuming for many generations.  The Barron's article also suggests that there is logic behind adding items to the CPI as they become significant parts of the consumers' purchases.  For example, automobiles were added in 1935, air conditioners in 1964, and cell phones in 1998.  While these items may be significant purchases, they don't represent the basic essential needs which we are tracking in our GBNI.  Adding new items to an index that tracks consumer spending makes sense, but we maintain that some of the other manipulations to the CPI calculation over the years are harder to explain.

The modifications to the CPI introduced in the late 1990s, according to the article, suggest that inflation might be understated by 1.3 percentage points per year.  Therefore the calculation of 1.8 percent inflation over the past year could actually be closer to 3.1 percent -- and going by our chart above -- the CPI calculation of 2.5 percent since January 1, 2000 would actually be 3.8 percent.  



July 11, 2013


Prices May Appear Subdued on the Surface… but Rising Costs Percolate Below


Each month, the U.S. Government tells the public what the inflation rate is when it announces the Consumer Price Index (CPI).  In these letters, we have maintained that what U.S. consumers experience in their daily lives does not always match the low inflation numbers in the CPI data.  Our Guild Basic Needs IndexTM tracks the rising costs of basic, essential needs: food, clothing, shelter, and energy (used for cooking, heating, and transportation).  These are items whose changes in cost can dramatically affect the standard of living.


Even though the prices of the items tracked in our GBNI are significantly higher than the CPI, it has not been enough to cause an inflationary psychology to take hold.  Our view is that at some point inflation will feature prominently in the public’s consciousness.


Some Prices Impact Consumers’ Behavior More than Others


The large research firm, Neilsen, has published the results of their survey where they asked Americans what has the greatest impact on how they shop. Based on their research, the two items that had the biggest impact on buying habits were: rising food prices and rising gas prices — items that they have to buy.  We believe that rising prices of basic, essential needs will spur the next phase of uncomfortably high inflation.  Therefore, we will continue to track and publish our analysis here and in our weekly Global Market Commentaries.

__________________________________________________________________

Exclusion of Liability

This website is for informational purposes only and is not intended to be a solicitation, offering or recommendation of any security. This website does not intend to provide investment, tax or legal advice. Guild Investment Management does not represent that the securities, products, or services discussed in this site are suitable or appropriate for all investors. The site may not meet your specific needs or requirements. Any market analysis constitutes an opinion that may not be correct. You must make your own independent investment decisions or obtain professional advice from your advisors before making investment decisions.

The information on this site is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person or entity in any jurisdiction or country where such distribution or use would be contrary to law or regulation, or which would subject Guild Investment Management to any registration requirement within such jurisdiction or country.

The material on this site, including any opinions expressed herein, are subject to change without notice. In addition, there are many market, currency, economic, political, business, technological and other risks that are beyond our control. We make reasonable efforts to provide accurate content on the site. However, some content and some of the assumptions, formulas, algorithms and other data that impact the content may be inaccurate, outdated, or otherwise inappropriate. In addition, we may have conflicts of interest with respect to any investments mentioned on the site. Our principals and our clients may hold positions in investments mentioned on the site or we may take positions contrary to investments mentioned on the site.

BY USING THIS SITE YOU AGREE THAT GUILD INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, INC. AND ITS PRINCIPALS ARE NOT LIABLE FOR ANY ACTION YOU TAKE OR ANY DECISION YOU MAKE IN RELIANCE ON ANY CONTENT. WE DO NOT GIVE INDIVIDUALIZED INVESTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS, OR ACCOUNTING, TAX OR LEGAL ADVICE ON OR THROUGH THE SITE.

Although the site includes investment related information, you should not consider anything you find on the site to be a recommendation that you buy, sell, hold or otherwise invest in an individual security, or any other investment or asset.

Certain of the content at this web site, including Guild’s current and past market commentaries, is protected by copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act, you must not copy, frame, modify, transmit or distribute the market commentaries, without seeking the prior consent of Guild.

You may have been referred to this site by some other person or organization or may have linked to this site from the website of another organization. We appreciate such referrals, but are not affiliated with any persons or organizations who may have referred us to you, and we do not pay for any such referrals. In addition, any persons making referrals are not responsible for Guild’s portfolio management decisions, which are the sole responsibility of Guild.

Tel: (310) 826-8600 | Fax: (310) 826-8611 | Email: guild@guildinvestment.com
12400 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1080, Los Angeles, CA 90025
Copyright © 2012 Guild Investment - All Rights Reserved